Overview Location Master Plan Floor Plans Gallery Amenities Pricing Reviews About Enquire Now

Why this page carries no ratings, no testimonials and no resident reviews

There are no residents at Doddabele. There are no buyers, no handovers, no possession dates that have come and gone, and no maintenance association to have an opinion about the lifts. Asian Fab Kengeri is a scheme at the environmental-study stage. Nothing has been built and nothing has been sold.

Any page that offers you a star rating for this project, a review count, or a quote from a happy owner is manufacturing it. We will not do that. What follows instead is the assessment a careful analyst would write from the documents that actually exist: what is genuinely strong here, what is genuinely weak, what is simply unknown, and what a buyer would be accepting if they committed money at this stage.

Asian Fab Kengeri is the working title used on this site. Asian Fab Tec Limited has not announced a marketing name for the development.

What is genuinely verified about Asian Fab Kengeri

The strongest thing about this project is that a real, signed, checkable regulatory file exists. That is more than can be said for a great many schemes marketed as "pre-launch" in Bengaluru. Three filings sit on the PARIVESH portal, all by Asian Fab Tec Limited, all on the same parcel.

ItemVerified value
PromoterAsian Fab Tec Limited
Proposal numberSIA/KA/INFRA2/579724/2026
StatusStandard Terms of Reference granted 8 July 2026 by SEAC Karnataka
Category and scheduleB1, Schedule 8(b) Townships / Area Development Projects
Land6.2624 hectares — 15.47 acres
Built-up area287,985.28 sq m
Declared project costRs 526.27 crore
Survey numbersSy No. 7/2, 7/3, 7/4, 7/6, 7/1A, 7/1B
VillageDoddabele, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban
Land statusPrivately owned, acquired, classified residential land, DC conversion on file

These are not brochure numbers. They come from a certificate issued by a state expert appraisal committee, and the land status and survey numbers are consistent across the filing set. The parcel is assembled, converted and in the promoter's hands. For a buyer whose main fear at pre-launch is that the land itself is not clean or not secured, that is a real and unusually specific comfort.

An earlier proposal on the same parcel, SIA/KA/INFRA2/569887/2026, received Standard Terms of Reference on 9 March 2026 with a built-up area of 273,029.69 sq m and a declared cost of Rs 562.67 crore. That filing is superseded; the operative numbers are those of the July 2026 grant. It is worth noting only for what it tells you about stage: the scheme's own filed dimensions were still being restated four months before the current grant. Design is not frozen here. That is normal at the study stage, and it is a reason to treat any programme detail you are shown as provisional.

One inference, with the working shown. 287,985.28 sq m converts to about 3.10 million sq ft of gross built-up area. Set against the 6.2624-hectare (62,624 sq m) parcel, that is a built-up-to-land ratio of about 4.6 times (287,985.28 ÷ 62,624). This is our arithmetic, and it is a scale marker only. It is not a Floor Area Ratio: gross built-up area includes basements, parking decks, circulation cores, walls and the clubhouse, none of which enter an FAR calculation the same way. No sanctioned FAR for this site has been published, and we are not asserting one.

The declared project cost of Rs 526.27 crore is a figure submitted for environmental appraisal, not an audited construction budget and not a sales-cost model. The certificate does not record what it includes. We do not divide it by the built-up area to produce a cost per square foot, and nobody else should either: the superseded March filing declared a higher cost against a smaller built-up area, so the two quantities have already moved in opposite directions between filings. The developer has published no price for this project, and no arithmetic on the filed cost is a substitute for one.

The strongest connectivity fact: Challaghatta metro at 2.76 km by road

The single best locational argument for this site is the western end of Namma Metro's Purple Line.

DestinationRoad distance from the site
Challaghatta metro station (Purple Line western terminus)2.76 km
Kengeri railway station3.67 km
Kengeri Bus Terminal4.64 km
Jnanabharati metro7.12 km
Nandi Infrastructure Corridor (NICE Road)6.02 km
Sattva Global City / Global Village Tech Park5.71 km
HK Hospital1.77 km
Rajarajeshwari Hospital and Medical College2.44 km (medical college campus 3.25 km)
ACS College of Engineering1.73 km
Basava Residential Girls School1.42 km
Anchepalya Lake3.44 km
YGR Signature Mall7.61 km

Every figure above is routed road distance, not a line drawn on a map. Challaghatta is an operational terminus, not a proposed one, and 2.76 km by road is a short, repeatable trip — on our modelling, somewhere between about four minutes in free-flowing conditions and about ten minutes at Bengaluru's congested-city rate. A terminus station also means a seat on the outbound train in the morning, which is a material daily difference from boarding mid-line.

Two honest qualifications. First, it is not walkable, and nobody should describe it as such. Second, the map flatters this location badly. Challaghatta is 1.19 km away in a straight line and 2.76 km by road — the road detour is more than double. The same pattern repeats across the neighbourhood: a school 0.59 km away as the crow flies is 3.07 km by road; a hospital and medical college 1.11 km away in a straight line is 2.44 km of driving. If you assess this site by dropping a pin and eyeballing distances, you will systematically overestimate how close everything is. The routed numbers above are the ones to plan around.

Road naming, because marketing material blurs it

The site is reached off Mysore Road, the old SH-17 alignment now numbered NH-275, via the Doddabele village road. The access-controlled Bengaluru–Mysuru Expressway is a separate six-lane alignment whose Bengaluru end is the NICE Road junction near Kengeri. The site does not front the expressway. Anyone who tells you this project is "on the expressway" is collapsing three different roads into one. The last leg to the parcel is a village road, and its condition and width at the time you visit are worth seeing for yourself.

Asian Fab Tec Limited has no residential track record

This is the most important paragraph on this page, and it is the one most likely to be left out elsewhere.

Asian Fab Tec Limited is not a real-estate developer. Asian Fab Kengeri is its first known residential project.

The company's own website records that it was incorporated on 14 August 2000 as Asian Cylinders Limited, manufacturing LPG cylinders, and was renamed Asian Fab Tec Ltd with effect from 10 February 2006. Its founder is Mr K. H. Puttaswamy Gowda. Its registered office is Plot No. 15, II Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru 560058 — the same address that appears on the signed SEAC certificate and on the PARIVESH application form. Its own page title describes it as an electrical contractor. It runs four divisions: power projects, construction, fabrication and solar photovoltaics. None of them is property. The project list on its own site contains exactly one entry: Sira Solar Projects.

We looked for a residential record three separate ways and found none. There is no Asian Fab Tec registration anywhere in the Karnataka RERA registry across all 9,907 rows. There is no residential project on the company's own website. There is no credible press coverage of a delivered housing scheme.

None of this makes the company a bad actor. It has an engineering business operating since 2000 from a real industrial address, with a checkable EPC and contracting history, and it has filed for this land properly and in its own name. Contractors do become housing developers, and some become good ones.

But it does mean something specific for you. There is no delivery track record here to assess. You cannot look at a previous project's handover date and judge whether this one will slip. You cannot walk a completed tower and judge the finish. You cannot ask an existing owners' association about how snags were handled or how the maintenance transition went. Every one of the ordinary due-diligence moves a buyer makes on a pre-launch is unavailable, because there is nothing prior to inspect. That is a material risk and it should be priced into your decision, not explained away.

The regulatory stage, and what a buyer gives up before registration

Asian Fab Kengeri is not registered with the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority. There is no registration number, and no pending application. Under Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, a project in a registrable class may not lawfully be advertised, marketed, booked or sold until registration has been granted. This microsite is an information and enquiry resource for a scheme at the approvals stage. It is not a booking channel, and no allotment can be offered here.

It is equally important to be precise about the environmental position. A granted Terms of Reference is not an Environmental Clearance. A ToR is permission to conduct the impact study and a specification of what that study must examine. The certificate itself states that it does not amount to approvals, consent or permissions. The clearance application for this parcel, SIA/KA/INFRA2/573357/2026, was filed on 21 April 2026 and remains referred to SEIAA and undecided. The correct statement of the position is that Standard Terms of Reference were granted on 8 July 2026, and the environmental clearance application remains under consideration.

What a buyer forgoes by committing before registration is concrete, not theoretical:

  • No registered project page. Once a project is registered, K-RERA publishes the sanctioned plans, the promoter's declared timelines, the approvals list and quarterly progress updates. None of that exists yet, so there is nothing independent to check a claim against.
  • No escrow discipline. The Act's requirement that a defined share of collections sit in a separate project account, drawn down against certified progress, attaches on registration. Money handed over earlier does not have that protection.
  • No statutory carpet area. The Act defines carpet area and requires sale on that basis. Pre-registration, any area you are quoted is whatever the quoting party means by it.
  • No enforceable completion date. A registered project carries a declared date the Authority can hold the promoter to. There is no such date here, and the launch and completion quarters circulating in early material are template defaults, not commitments.
  • A weaker complaints route. The Authority's adjudication machinery is built around registered projects. A dispute over a pre-registration payment is a harder, slower matter.

If you take one thing from this page: any amount paid before registration — however it is labelled, whether expression of interest, pre-registration amount, priority booking or token — sits outside the statutory protections the Act was written to give you.

The unknowns, stated plainly

A serious assessment has to be as clear about what is missing as about what is present. On this project, a great deal is missing.

Question a buyer will askHonest answer
How many apartments?Not disclosed in any filing. The client brief describes 1,336 apartments; no primary document states a unit count.
How many towers?Not stated anywhere we could verify. We publish no tower count.
What configurations and sizes?The brief offers 2 BHK 750–950 sq ft, 3 BHK 1,000–1,350 sq ft and 4 BHK 1,350–1,700 sq ft, with its own caveat that these are tentative pending RERA. Unconfirmed throughout.
What price?None. The developer has published nothing, and there is no base rate, floor rise, preferential-location charge or payment schedule in existence.
What amenities?A clubhouse is named in the project title on the filing itself. Beyond that, no amenity schedule has been published; the list circulating in early material is generic boilerplate that appears near-identically in unrelated projects.
Who is the sanctioning authority?Not recorded in any document we could obtain.
When does it launch or complete?No committed date exists.

Both signed certificates were read in full and searched for tower, unit, dwelling, flat, storey and BHK counts. There were no programme hits at all. The only quantity either certificate carries is the product line: "Residential Apartment with Club House and Amenities — 287,985.28 SQMT". The conceptual plan that would settle the mix is authentication-gated on the portal and could not be retrieved.

For scale only, and drawing no conclusion: 3.10 million sq ft of gross built-up area against the brief's 1,336 apartments is about 2,320 sq ft of gross built-up area per unit (3,100,000 ÷ 1,336). Gross built-up includes basements, parking, circulation, walls and the clubhouse, and is therefore always far larger than any saleable area. That arithmetic neither supports nor refutes the brief's figure. We publish it so you can see the numbers we have, not as evidence for a unit count.

On the sanctioning body: Doddabele is a revenue village under H. Gollahalli Gram Panchayat, outside the former BBMP municipal area. A boundary test places the parcel within roughly 63 m of the Greater Bengaluru Authority boundary, with its filed extent apparently straddling it. BBMP was dissolved on 2 September 2025 and replaced by the Greater Bengaluru Authority, and BDA's planning jurisdiction is reportedly being reduced, so the position in this belt is genuinely unsettled. A buyer should verify the sanctioned plan and the sanctioning body directly with the developer. We will not name an authority we cannot evidence.

Living at Doddabele: the trade-offs worth walking

Two things about the immediate locality deserve to be stated neutrally rather than skipped.

BWSSB operates a 40 MLD sewage treatment plant at Doddabele, roughly 1.1 km from the site by road, and a 100 MLD expansion is proposed on the same premises. It is proposed, not under construction. Within the wider belt the corroborated neighbours are Hemmigepura at 13 MLD and Kengeri at 60 MLD. Sewage treatment capacity in a growing corridor is infrastructure a locality needs, and living near it is a real, checkable consideration about prevailing wind, odour on particular days and future expansion. Visit at different times of day before you decide how much it matters to you.

The second is simply that this is still a village edge in transition. The everyday anchors are close by road — a hospital at 1.77 km, an engineering college at 1.73 km, a school at 1.42 km, a lake at 3.44 km — but the wider retail and schooling choice sits further out: the nearest mall in our routed set is YGR Signature Mall at 7.61 km, and the nearest of the well-known school names, National Public School Kengeri, is 4.52 km by road. A household that wants an established neighbourhood on day one will find this belt thin. A household comfortable that a metro terminus 2.76 km away pulls services in over the coming years may see that differently. Neither view is wrong; they are different appetites for waiting.

Price: nothing published, and what the corridor actually prints

The developer has published no price for this project. Not a rate, not a range, not a payment plan. There is nothing to review.

What can be reviewed is the corridor. ANAROCK's Q2 2026 Bengaluru report puts the Mysore Road micro-market average capital value at Rs 8,040 per sq ft, up 2% quarter on quarter, against a Bengaluru city average of Rs 9,450 per sq ft. So this corridor sits below the city average, which is the usual shape for a western periphery with a working metro line.

The comparison people reach for is Electronic City, at Rs 7,450 per sq ft in the same quarter, making Mysore Road 7.9% higher. The trend matters more than the snapshot, and it runs the opposite way to the popular telling: Mysore Road has printed above Electronic City in all three quarters on record, and the premium narrowed from 9.3% to 7.9% in Q2 2026. Electronic City is closing the gap, not the reverse.

For a launched product in the same corridor, Casagrand Moondance at Kumbalgodu publishes a market price of Rs 7,499 per sq ft alongside a discounted "Casagrand Price" of Rs 5,799 per sq ft, both on built-up area, with 3 BHK homes at Rs 1.18 crore to Rs 1.31 crore for 1,650–1,864 sq ft. Both figures need to be read together. Quoting Rs 5,799 on its own presents a promotional discount as a market rate, and it is not one.

None of this tells you what Asian Fab Kengeri will cost. It tells you the band the corridor is trading in, which is the only honest thing anyone can tell you today.

Against a launched peer: the axis is scale and stage, not locality

The useful comparison is not "which locality is nicer". Casagrand Moondance and Asian Fab Kengeri sit on the same corridor and would be judged on entirely different grounds.

ItemAsian Fab KengeriA launched corridor peer
StageTerms of Reference granted; EC application under consideration; not RERA registeredLaunched, registered, priced
PriceNone publishedPublished, and comparable against others
Unit mixNot disclosedSpecified
Developer record in housingNone foundEstablished, with delivered projects
Scale15.47 acres, 3.10 million sq ft of filed built-up areaSmaller
What you are buyingA filed intention on secured, converted landA defined product with statutory protections

Read that table as a description of two different kinds of decision. One is a purchase. The other is, at this stage, a bet on a scheme reaching registration on terms you have not yet seen, from a company that has not built homes before.

Who this project suits, and who it does not

It may suit a buyer who is genuinely early, who values the Purple Line terminus at 2.76 km by road above everything else, who is comfortable waiting for registration before any money changes hands, and who is capable of reading a sanctioned plan and an approvals list themselves when those eventually appear. The land is clean, converted and assembled, the parcel is large, and the filing is real. Those are good foundations to watch from.

It does not suit a buyer who needs to move within a defined timeframe, who needs a price today to plan a loan, who wants the reassurance of walking a developer's completed project, who needs the Act's escrow and carpet-area protections in place before committing, or who is being asked to pay anything at all right now. If someone is pressing you for a payment on this project today, the correct answer is no — not because of anything wrong with the scheme, but because registration has not happened and the law says so.

What would change this assessment

We would revise this page on any of the following, and each is a checkable event rather than a promise:

  • The Environmental Clearance decision on SIA/KA/INFRA2/573357/2026.
  • A K-RERA registration number being granted, which would bring sanctioned plans, declared timelines and an enforceable completion date into public view.
  • A sanctioned plan and the name of the sanctioning body being produced by the developer.
  • A published unit mix, tower configuration and amenity schedule from the developer rather than from circulating material.
  • The first published price, on a defined area basis.

Until then, the honest summary is short. Asian Fab Kengeri is a 15.47-acre scheme at Doddabele with a genuine regulatory file, secured and converted land, a strong metro anchor at 2.76 km by road, no disclosed product, no price, no environmental clearance, no RERA registration, and a promoter with a real engineering history and no homes delivered. Every one of those clauses is load-bearing. A page that gave you only the first half would not be worth reading.

Questions

Asian Fab Kengeri Reviews — frequently asked questions

What does the absence of registration mean for me as a buyer today?

It means the scheme is not legally available to buy. The Act's prohibition on pre-registration marketing and booking exists precisely to stop money moving before a regulator has seen the sanctioned plan, the title documents and the declared completion date. None of the protections that attach to a registered project attach here yet: there is no regulator-held record of the plan you would be buying into, no declared date the developer is accountable to, and no registered carpet-area schedule. This microsite is an information and enquiry resource for a scheme at the approvals stage — it is not a booking channel, and we do not take booking amounts or hold inventory.

What is the price?

There is none. Not from the developer, not in the client workbook — whose pricing tab is a blank house template — and not anywhere else we could reach. No base rate, no floor-rise, no preferential location charge, no payment schedule. Our records carry the price as unset and describe availability as pre-order, because that is the honest state of a scheme that cannot legally be sold yet. Anyone quoting you a firm per-square-foot figure for this project is quoting something the developer has not published. The most useful thing we can give you instead is verified context on what the surrounding micro-market transacts at, which is the next question.

How far is the nearest metro station, and can I walk to it?

Challaghatta metro station, the operational western terminus of Namma Metro's Purple Line, is 2.76 km from the site by road. That is the strongest connectivity fact this location has, and it is an operational station rather than a proposed one. But no, it is not a walk. The straight-line separation is about 1.19 km, and the road route runs more than twice that because of how the local road network connects back to the main alignment. Anyone describing this site as walking distance to the metro is quoting the map rather than the road. In practice it is a short drive or auto ride — roughly four minutes in clear conditions, and closer to ten at the worst of the peak.

Which authority sanctions the building plan in Doddabele?

The sanctioning authority for the site has not been recorded in any document we could obtain. The client brief says only "Local Planning Authority", which is not a named body, and there is no Kengeri or Ramohalli planning authority — BMRDA's own list of twelve planning authorities contains neither. Doddabele is a revenue village under H. Gollahalli Gram Panchayat, outside the former BBMP municipal area, but a boundary test puts the parcel within roughly 63 m of the Greater Bengaluru Authority boundary with its filed extent apparently straddling it. BBMP was dissolved on 2 September 2025 and replaced by the GBA, and BDA's planning jurisdiction is reportedly being reduced. The position is genuinely unsettled. Verify the sanctioned plan and the sanctioning body directly with the developer.

Where does the environmental clearance application stand?

Undecided. An Environmental Clearance Form-1 was filed on 21 April 2026 as proposal SIA/KA/INFRA2/573357/2026, and its status on the portal reads "Referred to SEIAA". That is the whole of what the public record shows. There is no grant, no rejection and no published date by which a decision is expected. We could not retrieve the underlying Form-1 record itself — the portal returns a server error on that proposal every time we have tried. So the position is simply that an application is live and no outcome has been recorded.

Enquire

Enquire about Asian Fab Kengeri

Asian Fab Kengeri is at the stage where the useful thing is information rather than a booking, because there is no lawful booking to make. Leave your details and we will tell you when the position changes — when a Karnataka RERA number is issued, when the environmental file moves, and when the developer publishes a price, a floor plate and an amenity schedule. The enquiry form asks for a name, phone number, email address and message; name and phone are required.